Question time in the Finnish Parliament on Thursday gave way to a bitter national controversy over the government's messages on the advisability of wearing masks in the first phase of the coronavirus pandemic. Opposition MPs and citizens on social media accuse the government and the prime minister of having knowingly lied to the people.
The origin of the controversy is the words of Prime Minister Sanna Marin in which she admitted that last spring the Government decided not to recommend the use of masks to the public because there were not enough supplies in the country.
"If a general recommendation had been given to use masks without masks available, what confusion would have arisen without masks available?" Marin asked on Thursday.
In fact, during the first wave of the pandemic Finland became one of the few countries in the world whose government questioned the usefulness of face masks against coronavirus. Senior officials from the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health went so far as to present publicly a report saying that the benefits of face shields were minimal or non-existent and that its use could even increase the risks of contracting the Covid-19 disease.
The government changed its mind towards the use of masks by mid-August. When the cases began to rise again, Prime Minister Marin herself appeared at a press conference with the head of THL to recommend its use in public transport and in confined places where it was not possible to keep a safe distance.
Now, with the epidemic almost out of control in many areas of the country, public authorities have recently extended the recommendation to wear masks.
#MaskiGate
Marin's recognition that she was not guided by health criteria when in spring the government decided not to recommend the use of face masks has caused a great controversy on Twitter, where the hashtag #MaskiGate became a trending topic. Some MPs and private citizens have directly accused the prime minister of "lying" and of playing with the health of the population.
Miksi maskeista ei kerrottu totuutta keväällä kansalle? Totuus ei ollutkaan se, että hengityssuojaimista ei olisi hyötyä tai, että jopa niistä olisi haittaa ja vaaraa. Näin keväällä suomalaisille uskoteltiin. #maskigate #marin @oikeuskansleri #salailu @valtioneuvosto #stm #thl
— Timo Heinonen (@timoheinonen) October 9, 2020
Koronakriisi jatkunee vielä pitkään. Eduskunnan ja suomalaisten on voitava luottaa kriisin hoidosta vastaavaan ministeriin. Nyt näin ei ole.
— Petteri Orpo (@PetteriOrpo) October 9, 2020
Siksi @MiaLaiho & @KaiMykkanen esittävät, että eduskunta toteaisi, ettei ministeri Kiuru nauti eduskunnan luottamusta. Tuen esitystä.
Pääministeri myöntää hallituksen valehdelleen koko kevään maskien tarpeellisuudesta, koska niitä ei ollut? Jossakin muualla joku eroaisi, meillä business as usual. Uutiskynnys ylittyy yhdessä iltapäivälehdessä.
— Jussi Halla-aho (@Halla_aho) October 8, 2020
Keväällä kerrottiin että maskeista ei ole hyötyä. Nyt kerrotaan että on niistä hyötyä, keväällä vaan valehdeltiin, kun ei ollut riittävästi maskeja. Aikamoista. Laajamittaista, suunniteltua valehtelua. Mistähän kaikesta muusta hallitus ja virkamiehet ihmisille nyt valehtelevat 🤔
— Mikael Jungner (@MikaelJungner) October 8, 2020
Aion nukkua yön yli ja pohtia. Mutta kyllä alkaa näyttämään @KirsiVarhila @Twivikka siltä, että te olette harhauttaneet maamme hallitusta ja eduskuntaa selvityksillänne. Samoin @mapetti @mika_salminen. Pseudotieteellinen maskiselvityksenne täysi farssi. Hävetkää!
— Mikko Kärnä (@KarnaMikko) October 8, 2020
Finnish media have also rescued the old spring news from their archives, with headlines showing that the government alerted through Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Health Kirsi Varhila that, according to a report submitted to the government, the masks could increase the risk of contagion.
According to the newspaper Iltalehti, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health paid more than 26,000 euros for that report on the use of face masks to the company Summaryx Oy, which produced it quickly, in just two weeks.
